Activists Freedom of Expression, Donny BU, stated that the concern for Indonesia is not true of the SOPA said her make similar rules. But if it already exists, its implementation could be excessive.
Especially in Indonesia rules of intellectual property is being strengthened. No doubt, this could provoke the government to adopt SOPA so rule in Indonesia.
"Yes it's okay if a good implementation of the rules. The has-been, it's a rule to suppress the small people.
Donny himself assess SOPA has a goal that should be appreciated. It's just a good purpose when used for people who have power want to suppress freedom of expression, it could happen.
"SOPA able to silence a site like WikiLeaks and otherwhistle-blowers. Why? Yes because its content does not belong to the whistle blower tho?" he concluded.
SOPA itself is still in the stage of legislation. Before diketok ratification, a number of service providers on the internet in droves to vent rejection. Such as Google, WordPress, WikiPedia, up to Twitter.
Because the SOPA feared could change the model of information dissemination on the internet. Because the rule allows the U.S. government and corporate copyright holders to target foreign websites alias from outside the U.S. that are considered in violation, piracy or counterfeiting of intellectual property.
For example, if there are websites that have been accused of illegal content that violates copyright (including songs, pictures, video clips, etc.), then the site can be blocked by ISPs in the U.S., was posted from a search engine, and even intercepted to run online business with providers of payment services like PayPal.
"SOPA able to silence a site like WikiLeaks and otherwhistle-blowers. Why? Yes because its content does not belong to the whistle blower tho?" he concluded.
SOPA itself is still in the stage of legislation. Before diketok ratification, a number of service providers on the internet in droves to vent rejection. Such as Google, WordPress, WikiPedia, up to Twitter.
Because the SOPA feared could change the model of information dissemination on the internet. Because the rule allows the U.S. government and corporate copyright holders to target foreign websites alias from outside the U.S. that are considered in violation, piracy or counterfeiting of intellectual property.
For example, if there are websites that have been accused of illegal content that violates copyright (including songs, pictures, video clips, etc.), then the site can be blocked by ISPs in the U.S., was posted from a search engine, and even intercepted to run online business with providers of payment services like PayPal.
2 komentar:
A useful post buddy..
Yes this is indeed a useful information
Post a Comment